SUPPLEMENTARY APLICATION IN AMPARO PROCEEDINGS. UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE AMPARO LAW, THE NATIONAL CODE OF CIVIL AND FAMILY PROCEDURE IS IMMEDIATELY APPLICABLE UPON ITS ENTRY INTO FORCE, WITHOUT BEING CONDITIONED ON THE DECLARATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE PROVIDED FOR IN ITS TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS.
by GPD Law | Apr 22, 2026 | Alerts
The Regional Plenary on Administrative and Civil Matters of the Central-South Region, based in Mexico City, in resolving the conflict of criteria 106/2025, determined that pursuant to Article 2 of the Amparo Law, as amended on March 13, 2025, the National Code of Civil and Family Procedures applies on a supplementary basis to the amparo proceedings and any appeals arising therefrom immediately upon its entry into force, without being subject to the declaration of commencement of effectiveness set forth in its transitional provisions.
The court reasoned that the legal basis and regulation of the amparo proceeding derive from the Constitution and the Amparo Law itself. Accordingly, the operation of amparo proceedings cannot be conditioned or regulated by other statutes, even those of equal hierarchical rank. In addition, the current amendment to the Amparo Law expressly designates the National Code of Civil and Family Procedures as supplementary legislation.
Therefore, the declaration of effective date contemplated in the Second Transitional Article of the National Code was designed to govern the gradual implementation of that code as the principal procedural framework for ordinary proceedings, rather than to prevent its use as supplementary legislation expressly incorporated by a constitutional regulatory statute.
In that regard, the transitional regime of a national procedural code—intended for the ordinary justice system—cannot restrict the manner in which the Amparo Law fills procedural gaps through supplementary application. For such supplementary application to operate, the requirements established in binding precedent 2a./J. 34/2013 (10th Era), issued by the former Second Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, must be satisfied.
The court further noted that when the legislature intended to subject legal reforms involving regulatory harmonization to the gradual implementation framework of the National Code, it did so expressly in a separate decree. No such limitation was included in the above-mentioned amendment to the Amparo Law, reinforcing the conclusion that its application is immediate.
This precedent was published on April 17, 2026, in the Federal Judicial Weekly Gazette under digital record No. 2032044.
For any questions or legal assistance, please contact admin@gpdlaw.mx
José Alberto
Domínguez Téllez
Dispute Resolution
Partner
Mauricio de Jesús
Soto Rodríguez
Dispute Resolution
Jr. Associate
José Alberto
Domínguez Téllez
Dispute Resolution
Partner
Mauricio de Jesús
Soto Rodríguez
Dispute Resolution
Jr. Associate
Latest Publications
Opposition action against merger of corporations
CREDITOR’S OPPOSITION ACTION AGAINST MERGER OF CORPORATIONS IS NOT DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL.by GPD Law | Jun 25, 2026 | Alerts The…
Default interesest continues to accrue despide suspension of judicial activities and proceedular deadlines during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
DEFAULT INTERESEST CONTINUES TO ACCRUE DESPIDE SUSPENSION OF JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES AND PROCEEDULAR DEADLINES DURING THE SARS-CoV-2 PANDEMIC.by GPD Law |…
Blocking, suspension and/or limitation of the funds in an account by a banking institution
BLOCKING, SUSPENSION AND/OR LIMITATION OF THE FUNDS IN AN ACCOUNT BY A BANKING INSTITUTION IN TERMS OF THE CONTRACT ENTERED…
Artificial intelligence applied in judicial processes.
Artificial intelligence applied in judicial processes.by GPD Law | Jan 13, 2026 | Alerts The Second Collegiate Court for Civil…
Related direct constitucional claims must be resolved in the same session
RELATED DIRECT CONSTITUCIONAL CLAIMS MUST BE RESOLVED IN THE SAME SESSION, EVEN WHEN THE PLAINTIFF ALLEGES ILLEGAL SUMMONS, PROVIDED THAT…
Executive oral commercial trial
EXECUTIVE ORAL COMMERCIAL TRIAL. THE RULINGS ISSUED IN THE ENFORCEMENT STAGE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO APPEAL.by GPD Law | Sep…
The enforcement of a mediation agreement in Mexico City
APPEALING IS INADMISSIBLE AGAINST THE RULING THAT DECLARES ADMISSIBLE AND ORDERS THE ENFORCEMENT OF A MEDIATION AGREEMENT IN MEXICO CITY.by…
Amendments to the federal antitrust law
AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAW.by GPD Law | Jul 23, 2025 | Alerts On July 16th, 2025, the decree…
Advisory opinions of the inter-american court of human rights
ADVISORY OPINIONS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ARE NOT LEGALLY BINDING FOR MEXICAN JUDGES, BUT THEY HOLD LEGAL…
